header image

The Pickens Plan

If you’re like me you are intrigued by the Pickens Plan but don’t know what to make of this oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens trying to get us off foreign oil. What is his agenda? Is this some ploy for him to get richer at our expense? And what’s with the first initial in his name? Is there something wrong with his first name? Anyways, it sure seems like a good plan though on the surface. I am all for getting completely off foreign oil and he seems to be the only person doing anything about it. Natural gas cars? I’m ok with that. It’s a good temporary solution. Big problem though. There’s only one car in the U.S. that runs on natural gas, the Honda Civic GX. These cars are on backorder but you can convert your gasoline car to CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) for about $2000. There are no fuel stations in Alabama which mean you need a home fueling station but you must stay close to home for now. How long will it take to add natural gas to all fuel stations? A home fueling station costs about $6000 to install. That $8000 dollars you need to spend to switch would buy a lot of gasoline. I think I’ll wait for the natural gas stations.

Wind energy? Ok. I’m not really sure how much energy can really be generated by wind alone but I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt. Same with solar. I’m willing to support the Pickens Plan for now. We have to do something. What else should we do? Nuclear 1000%. It’s good enough for France and supposedly that’s what Iran wants to use it for. Yeah right. Nuclear is all-American, abundant, and clean. Zero emissions. Even though I don’t buy the global warming argument, I am all for reducing pollution if reasonably feasible. I would plug in my car if it meant the demise of the OPEC. I know the battery technology isn’t there yet, but I’m willing to bet it would not take too long to get it there. Never bet against American ingenuity. Coal is another good temporary solution for electricity since we have an awful lot of it.

What do I not like? Bio- fuels and hydrogen. Bio-fuels use up farm land and are subject to destruction by drought, frost, hurricanes, etc. This will probably lead to food shortages which we have already seen hints of with corn prices. And for your global warming, eco-warriors, bio-fuels will also produce carbon emissions. At first hydrogen fuel cells sounded like a great idea but hydrogen is derived from water. A water shortage is exactly what we don’t need.

As a capitalist, I’m all for Mr. Pickens getting rich with a great idea if it benefits all of us.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

7 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Pickens is part of the problem, He is not an oil Tycoon he is a speculator who has lived off rich wives since College days. 

    1. Bill Gordon L. Staff on September 5th, 2008 at 4:56 am
  2. I think the main problem with nuclear power is how to dispose of the radioactive waste that results from it. I went to school with the younger brother of S. David Freeman who was appointed head of TVA by President Carter. Freeman is against nuclear power but I’m not familiar with why that is. I believe he’s involved with hydrogen automobiles now. I noticed a few weeks ago an item about him being back in Chattanooga speaking out against nuclear power plants, several of which I think he closed down during his time with TVA.
     
    I’ve heard that some plants that Bio-fuels can be produced from can thrive on land that’s not conducive to farming.
     
    Maybe the answer is to work on every possible source of energy until it can be determined which is the best and most affordable, then go with the best 2 or 3.

    2. Don on September 5th, 2008 at 5:26 am
  3. Bill,   I sure wish I could live off rich wives!  So is he speculating on alternative energy trying to drive up the price?

    3. Scott Allan on September 5th, 2008 at 7:36 am
  4. Don, I don’t know S. David Freeman at all but the fact that he worked for Carter makes me question his judgment and agenda.  I believe the government wants to use Yucca Mountain.  This sounds like a perfect use of eminent domain for the public interest.

    4. Scott Allan on September 5th, 2008 at 8:12 am
  5. Pickens’ Plan kills bats.  (I’m serious.)
    The issue is no longer ‘which’ energy… it’s that every form of energy comes with costs.  And somewhere, someway, you can also find a whackjob who is offended at one of the costs.
    We won’t get a serious energy policy until we get real about the holistic costs and benefits instead of focusing on just one particular input or output.

    5. Ike on September 5th, 2008 at 10:02 am
  6. For those interested in this topic, just this morning (September 6) I stumbled across an editorial in the Opelika-Auburn News, that was, interestingly, written by a student at Auburn who has dated one of my grandsons off and on. “State emerges as new energy pioneer” can be read @ http://www.oanow.com/oan/news/opinion/brittany_branyon/article/brittany_branyon_state_emerges_as_new_energy_pioneer/35023/

    6. Don on September 6th, 2008 at 8:15 am
  7. While the O-A News is on my mind, I’d like to recommend that people read and comment on Jennifer Foster’s “Clarion-Caller – The Blog” over there. This young blogger writes some very interesting posts that I think deserve to be read and responded to. If you like what you see there, tell others about her blog which can be found @ http://www.gulfeast.com/index.php/OAN_Political_Blog/ and if you post a comment there tell Jennifer that I recommended her blog.  :-)

     

    7. Don on September 6th, 2008 at 8:24 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*