Scott Allan’s World

Sorry I’ve been away. I took my son to football camp and was just too busy to post anything. More on that later.

What I’m worried about is the pending liberal take-over of all three branches of government. What happens if President Obama gets to nominate a liberal to the Supreme Court? It is apparent based on this week’s decision on the Second Amendment that Ginsberg, Souter, Breyer, and Stevens have no regard for the Constitution. If there is one more liberal that agrees with them, we are doomed. How anyone can argue that the Second Amendment doesn’t mean what it says because we live in a different time and place from when it was written is insane.

In a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”

He said such evidence “is nowhere to be found.”

Nowhere to be found??? How about right in the Constitution? It’s there. Get those glasses checked old man. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
It’s the old liberal trick. If you say something loud and often enough, it must be true. I bet you think the emperor is wearing clothes too. Justice Stevens, whether you like it or not, the Constitution was in fact designed to limit the tools available to local officials so they don’t infringe on our basic liberties. That is the entire point of the Constitution. You sir are an idiot.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, “In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas.”

Um, yes there is dumbass. Aside from any Constitutional argument, I would bet everything I have that the ridiculous D.C. law has not deterred one crime BECAUSE CRIMINALS DON’T OBEY THE LAW! I’m not sure why gun control freaks don’t understand this. It probably did however prevent an innocent person from protecting himself in “crime-ridden urban areas”.

If you don’t like the Second Amendment, there is a method for altering the Constitution which does not consist of activist life-appointed Justices taking matters into their own hands. This is not an interpretation they are undertaking, it is a bastardization based on their personal beliefs.

Even if you are not thrilled by John McCain, you MUST vote for him. This election is bigger than who the next President is. Can you imagine an unchecked Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government with no regard for our Constitution?