header image

L’Eggo my lego

This story appears in TCS Daily

This is the most disgusting, blatant attempt at brainwashing our young children with Communist propaganda. This sort of teacher better not get anywhere near my children.

L’Eggo My Lego

By Maureen Martin : 28 Feb 2007

Some Seattle school children are being told to be skeptical of private property rights. This lesson is being taught by banning Legos.

A ban was initiated at the Hilltop Children’s Center in Seattle. According to an article in the winter 2006-07 issue of “Rethinking Schools” magazine, the teachers at the private school wanted their students to learn that private property ownership is evil.

According to the article, the students had been building an elaborate “Legotown,” but it was accidentally demolished. The teachers decided its destruction was an opportunity to explore “the inequities of private ownership.” According to the teachers, “Our intention was to promote a contrasting set of values: collectivity, collaboration, resource-sharing, and full democratic participation.”

The children were allegedly incorporating into Legotown “their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys.” These assumptions “mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society — a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive.”

They claimed as their role shaping the children’s “social and political understandings of ownership and economic equity … from a perspective of social justice.”

So they first explored with the children the issue of ownership. Not all of the students shared the teachers’ anathema to private property ownership. “If I buy it, I own it,” one child is quoted saying. The teachers then explored with the students concepts of fairness, equity, power, and other issues over a period of several months.

At the end of that time, Legos returned to the classroom after the children agreed to several guiding principles framed by the teachers, including that “All structures are public structures” and “All structures will be standard sizes.” The teachers quote the children:

“A house is good because it is a community house.”

“We should have equal houses. They should be standard sizes.”

“It’s important to have the same amount of power as other people over your building.”

The author goes on to point out how the Supreme Court has lessened the value of one’s property rights with their terrible ruling on Eminent Domain. She wonders if legos will be confiscated next by the government.

Technorati Tags , ,

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. You didn’t actually read the (original) article, did you? I’m liberal for the most part, so you can dismiss me as a “moonbat” or whatever name calling is on the talking points memo for today, but you’re only short changing yourself by taking this kind of pejorative writing at face value.

    1. on March 1st, 2007 at 12:57 am
  2. Thanks for taking the time to comment. Funny picture by the way! I was commenting on Maureen Martin’s article which I quoted almost completely. You are right that I did not read the original Rethinking Schools article that Ms. Martin quoted. I think I’ll save the $5 and rely on you to provide counterpoint for me since it sounds like you’ve read it. I’d like to hear your defense of it. From the parts I’ve read, I am not impressed.

    I won’t be calling you a “moonbat” though. It’s not really my style to use name calling to make a point. It doesn’t really accomplish anything. I try to respect dissenting opinions as long as they are well thought out.

    2. on March 1st, 2007 at 3:13 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image